{
  "schemaVersion": 3,
  "id": "article:ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains",
  "slug": "ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains",
  "title": "Commitment Boundaries in High-Stakes Domains",
  "canonicalPath": "/articles/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains/",
  "sourcePath": "content/articles/2026/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains/article.md",
  "agentBriefPath": "content/articles/2026/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains/agent.md",
  "thesis": "High-stakes AI use should be designed around commitment boundaries: AI may help prepare work, but external, legal, financial, public, or rights-affecting actions need stricter evidence, review, appeal, privacy, and accountability controls.",
  "status": "published",
  "maturity": "sprout",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-28",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-28",
  "audiences": [
    "builders",
    "researchers",
    "students",
    "agents"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "ai-agents",
    "agent-orchestration",
    "human-ai-interaction"
  ],
  "series": {
    "slug": "ai-delegation-orchestration",
    "title": "AI Delegation Orchestration",
    "season": "Season 1",
    "order": 7,
    "role": "chapter"
  },
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "claim-001",
      "claim": "High-stakes AI use should be designed around commitment boundaries: AI may help prepare work, but external, legal, financial, public, or rights-affecting actions need stricter evidence, review, appeal, privacy, and accountability controls.",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "status": "argument",
      "verification": {
        "reviewedAt": "2026-06-28",
        "reviewer": "human-publication-approval",
        "status": "verified"
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "sourceId": "source-nist-ai-rmf",
          "snippet": "AI risk guidance supports governance, measurement, risk mapping, and accountability as risk increases.",
          "supports": "background",
          "assessedAt": "2026-06-28"
        },
        {
          "sourceId": "source-eu-ai-act-2024-1689",
          "snippet": "The EU AI Act provides a regulatory example of obligations varying by AI system risk and use context.",
          "supports": "direct",
          "assessedAt": "2026-06-28"
        },
        {
          "sourceId": "source-aba-formal-opinion-512",
          "snippet": "Legal professional guidance shows that generative AI use can require confidentiality, competence, and supervisory duties.",
          "supports": "direct",
          "assessedAt": "2026-06-28"
        },
        {
          "sourceId": "source-unesco-generative-ai-education-research",
          "snippet": "Education guidance supports domain-specific guardrails, human agency, and protection of learners and researchers.",
          "supports": "direct",
          "assessedAt": "2026-06-28"
        }
      ],
      "counterevidence": [
        {
          "summary": "The delegation record and next-best-control models are proposed design primitives, not accepted standards.",
          "assessedAt": "2026-06-28"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "source-nist-ai-rmf",
      "title": "NIST AI Risk Management Framework",
      "url": "https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework",
      "type": "report",
      "accessed": "2026-06-28"
    },
    {
      "id": "source-eu-ai-act-2024-1689",
      "title": "EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689",
      "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng",
      "type": "standard",
      "accessed": "2026-06-28"
    },
    {
      "id": "source-aba-formal-opinion-512",
      "title": "American Bar Association, Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools",
      "url": "https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-512.pdf",
      "type": "report",
      "accessed": "2026-06-28"
    },
    {
      "id": "source-unesco-generative-ai-education-research",
      "title": "UNESCO guidance on generative AI in education and research",
      "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research",
      "type": "report",
      "accessed": "2026-06-28"
    }
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "type": "topic",
      "id": "topic:ai-agents"
    },
    {
      "type": "article",
      "id": "article:agent-control-planes"
    }
  ],
  "agentInstructions": [
    "Use claim IDs as the retrieval unit.",
    "Treat maturity=sprout as an exploratory uncertainty marker.",
    "Do not present proposed orchestration patterns as accepted standards.",
    "Keep examples generic and detached from private implementations."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "createdAt": "2026-06-28",
    "createdBy": "codex-agent",
    "agents": [
      {
        "role": "drafting-and-site-preview",
        "model": "gpt-5",
        "invokedAt": "2026-06-28",
        "inputHash": "sha256:9748d4fdb1648fbfa9a2e623bd90e286430984eba403b5e9b4e767d713d0d81e",
        "outputHash": "sha256:587876cee873881f45876d43e99ce8cc3d1c421535784b6b043a3d0bed87f4e1"
      }
    ],
    "reviews": [
      {
        "reviewer": "sibling-agent",
        "reviewedAt": "2026-06-28",
        "status": "commented",
        "scope": [
          "series structure",
          "evidence anchoring",
          "privacy"
        ],
        "notes": "Earlier sibling review identified source-ledger gaps; those gaps were resolved before publication with article-specific source alignment.",
        "resolvedAt": "2026-06-28"
      },
      {
        "reviewer": "human",
        "reviewedAt": "2026-06-28",
        "status": "approved",
        "scope": [
          "publication",
          "reader experience",
          "privacy",
          "series structure"
        ],
        "notes": "Human maintainer approved the local preview for website publication after article layout, reading-flow, privacy, and series-structure review.",
        "contentHash": "95d688f18c57d85bc47bf42659da888e3802d56ff121a43e3ae3ceaf49271250"
      },
      {
        "reviewer": "sibling-agent",
        "reviewedAt": "2026-06-28",
        "status": "approved",
        "scope": [
          "publication-gate",
          "source alignment",
          "provenance",
          "privacy",
          "generated artifacts"
        ],
        "notes": "Independent sibling review approved the final publication packet with no blocking findings after source-ledger, provenance, privacy, and generated-artifact checks.",
        "contentHash": "95d688f18c57d85bc47bf42659da888e3802d56ff121a43e3ae3ceaf49271250"
      }
    ],
    "policy": {
      "id": "policy:default",
      "version": "1.0.0"
    }
  },
  "contentHash": "95d688f18c57d85bc47bf42659da888e3802d56ff121a43e3ae3ceaf49271250",
  "generatedAt": "2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z",
  "articleUrl": "https://aura-knowledge.github.io/articles/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains/",
  "agentJsonPath": "/agents/articles/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains.json",
  "agentMarkdownPath": "/agents/articles/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains.md",
  "sourceRepoPath": "content/articles/2026/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains/article.md",
  "sourceGitHubUrl": "https://github.com/aura-knowledge/aura-knowledge.github.io/blob/main/content/articles/2026/ai-delegation-orchestration-07-commitment-boundaries-in-high-stakes-domains/article.md",
  "tokenEstimate": 200,
  "sectionOutline": []
}