User Migration and the Exit Problem
Explains why users rarely leave harmful platforms even when alternatives exist, and what interoperability and federation could change.
Topic
11 articles explore this thread.
Explains why users rarely leave harmful platforms even when alternatives exist, and what interoperability and federation could change.
Surveys public-health precedents to argue that attention-extraction platforms can be treated as design problems, not only user-responsibility problems.
Examines the design mechanics and usage scale of short-form video in India, separating documented harms from hype and tracing the opportunity cost.
Offers household-level strategies for managing screens: device-free meals, modeling, shared creative time, and age-appropriate boundaries.
Catalogues the interaction-design patterns that keep users in feeds longer than intended, and why each one is a choice, not an inevitable feature of digital life.
Uses observational and survey evidence to describe how phones and headphones reshape public space in India, and what incidental conversation, learning, and solidarity are displaced.
Surveys product and platform alternatives that could shift attention incentives from extraction to substance, evaluates build-new versus change-existing strategies, and proposes five differentiated product concepts with rationale and risks.
Honest uncertainty about the attention economy—causality, culture, regulation, and the choices that will shape India's next decade.
Surveys evidence on design interventions that reduce extraction: chronological feeds, friction before sharing, and user control over ranking algorithms.
Surveys proposed alternatives to engagement-based metrics and their tradeoffs: time well spent, learning outcomes, civic value, and sustainability.
Argues for age-appropriate design defaults, friction, and verification to protect children, elderly users, and others who are especially vulnerable to extraction.