User Migration and the Exit Problem
Explains why users rarely leave harmful platforms even when alternatives exist, and what interoperability and federation could change.
Topic
7 articles explore this thread.
Explains why users rarely leave harmful platforms even when alternatives exist, and what interoperability and federation could change.
Surveys public-health precedents to argue that attention-extraction platforms can be treated as design problems, not only user-responsibility problems.
Compares India’s IT Rules 2021 and DPDP Act 2023 with the EU DSA, UK OSA, and Australia’s eSafety framework. Regulation can curb harms but cannot alone make substance the easier path; design, business models, and public pressure matter too.
Compares India with Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria, the US, and China on screen time, platform concentration, and regulatory responses.
Argues for age-appropriate design defaults, friction, and verification to protect children, elderly users, and others who are especially vulnerable to extraction.
This synthesis article maps the actors and interventions that can redirect India's digital infrastructure toward substance—from individual habits and household rules to platform design, investor pressure, regulation, and civic accountability.
An exploration of how platform incentives could be redesigned to reward substance over extraction, from regulation and metrics to product alternatives like the fediverse.